Wikipedia:De Staminee
|
De Staminee ass eng Plaz fir sech z'entspanen, Froe kënnen ze stellen a sech iwwer de Projet ze renseignéieren. Reegelen
Fir datt de Staminee propper bleift, muss jidderee mathëllefen. Dofir biede mir Iech:
Kuckt ochÄnneren
|
Improving the translation support for Luxembourgish WikipediaÄnneren
Salut!
Apologies as this message is not in your native language, Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen.
Content translation has been successful in supporting the translation process on many Wikipedia communities, and we want to help additional wikis with the potential to grow using translation as part of a new initiative.
Content translation facilitates the creation of Wikipedia articles by translating content from other languages. It has been used already to create more than half a million articles. In addition, the tool provides mechanisms to encourage the creation of good quality content, preventing the publication of lightly edited machine translations. In general, our analysis shows that the translations produced are less likely to be deleted than the articles started from scratch.
Luxembourgish Wikipedia editors have used Content translation to create more than ninety articles. We think that there is potential to use translation to create more articles, expand existing ones, and attract new editors that learn how to make productive edits. Translation can help the community to reduce the language gap with other languages and grow the number of editors in a sustainable way. In order to achieve this goal, we want to collaborate with you to make Content translation more visible in the Luxembourgish Wikipedia and support new ways to translate.
As a first step, during the next weeks we plan to enable Content translation by default on Luxembourgish Wikipedia. That will make it easy for users to discover the tool through several entry points. However, users not interested in translation will still be able to disable it from their preferences.
Please feel free to share any comment in this conversation thread.
Thanks!
UOzurumba (WMF) (Diskussioun) 19:42, 7. Abr. 2021 (UTC)
Moving Wikimania 2021 to a Virtual EventÄnneren
Salut. Apologies if you are not reading this message in your native language. Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen. Merci!
Wikimania will be a virtual event this year, and hosted by a wide group of community members. Whenever the next in-person large gathering is possible again, the ESEAP Core Organizing Team will be in charge of it. Stay tuned for more information about how you can get involved in the planning process and other aspects of the event. Please read the longer version of this announcement on wikimedia-l.
ESEAP Core Organizing Team, Wikimania Steering Committee, Wikimedia Foundation Events Team, 15:15, 27. Jan. 2021 (UTC)
Project Grant Open CallÄnneren
This is the announcement for the Project Grants program open call that started on January 11, with the submission deadline of February 10, 2021.
This first open call will be focussed on Community Organizing proposals. A second open call focused on research and software proposals is scheduled from February 15 with a submission deadline of March 16, 2021.
For the Round 1 open call, we invite you to propose grant applications that fall under community development and organizing (offline and online) categories. Project Grant funds are available to support individuals, groups, and organizations to implement new experiments and proven ideas, from organizing a better process on your wiki, coordinating a campaign or editathon series to providing other support for community building. We offer the following resources to help you plan your project and complete a grant proposal:
- Weekly proposals clinics via Zoom during the Open Call. Join us for #Upcoming_Proposal_Clinics|real-time discussions with Program Officers and select thematic experts and get live feedback about your Project Grants proposal. We’ll answer questions and help you make your proposal better. We also offer these support pages to help you build your proposal:
- Video tutorials for writing a strong application
- General planning page for Project Grants
- Program guidelines and criteria
Program officers are also available to offer individualized proposal support upon request. Contact us if you would like feedback or more information.
We are excited to see your grant ideas that will support our community and make an impact on the future of Wikimedia projects. Put your idea into motion, and submit your proposal by February 10, 2021!
Please feel free to get in touch with questions about getting started with your grant application, or about serving on the Project Grants Committee. Contact us at projectgrants at wikimedia.org. Please help us translate this message to your local language. MediaWiki message delivery (Diskussioun) 08:01, 28. Jan. 2021 (UTC)
New Wikipedia Library Collections Available Now (February 2021)Änneren
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing new free, full-access, accounts to reliable sources as part of our research access program. You can sign up to access research materials on the Library Card platform:
- Taxmann – Taxation and law database
- PNAS – Official journal of the National Academy of Sciences
- EBSCO – New Arabic and Spanish language databases added
We have a wide array of other collections available, and a significant number now no longer require individual applications to access! Read more in our blog post.
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects!
- This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.
--12:57, 1. Feb. 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is back!Änneren
Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen
You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.
You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.
Please support us in translating the project page and a banner message to help us spread the word in your native language.
Kind regards,
Wiki loves Folklore International Team
MediaWiki message delivery (Diskussioun) 13:25, 6. Feb. 2021 (UTC)
Feminism & Folklore 1 February - 31 MarchÄnneren
Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen
Greetings!
You are invited to participate in Feminism and Folklore writing contest. This year Feminism and Folklore will focus on feminism, women's biographies and gender-focused topics for the project in league with Wiki Loves Folklore gender gap focus with folk culture theme on Wikipedia. folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, fairy tales, folk plays, folk arts, folk religion, mythology, etc.
You can help us in enriching the folklore documentation on Wikipedia from your region by creating or improving articles centered on folklore around the world, including, but not limited to folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, women and queer personalities in folklore, folk culture (folk artists, folk dancers, folk singers, folk musicians, folk game athletes, women in mythology, women warriors in folklore, witches and witch-hunting, fairy tales and more. You can contribute to new articles or translate from the list of suggested articles here.
You can also support us in translating the project page and help us spread the word in your native language.
Learn more about the contest and prizes from our project page. Thank you.
Feminism and Folklore team,
Joy Agyepong (talk) 02:40, 16. Feb. 2021 (UTC)
Proposal: Set two-letter project shortcuts as alias to project namespace globallyÄnneren
Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen
Hello everyone,
I apologize for posting in English. I would like to inform everyone that I created a new global request for comment (GRFC) at Meta Wiki, which may affect your project: m:Requests for comment/Set short project namespace aliases by default globally.
In this GRFC, I propose that two-project shortcuts for project names will become a default alias for the project namespace. For instance, on all Wikipedias, WP will be an alias to the Wikipedia: namespace (and similar for other projects). Full list is available in the GRFC.
This is already the case for Wikivoyages, and many individual projects asked for this alias to be implemented. I believe this makes it easier to access the materials in the project namespace, as well as creating shortcuts like WP:NPOV, as well as helps new projects to use this feature, without having to figure out how to request site configuration changes first.
As far as I can see, Wikipedia currently does not have such an alias set. This means that such an alias will be set for you, if the GRFC is accepted by the global community.
I would like to ask all community members to participate in the request for comment at Meta-Wiki, see m:Requests for comment/Set short project namespace aliases by default globally.
Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions about this proposal.
Best regards,
--Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:12, 18. Feb. 2021 (UTC)
Wikifunctions logo contestÄnneren
01:47, 2. Mäe. 2021 (UTC)
Checking files - what to do?Änneren
Hello from Denmark!
I hope you are all safe and happy!
You still remember me? :-)
I have not been very active on lb.wiki for some time because I took a wikibreak and because most of the files on lb.wiki have been checked.
Atm. there are 2.290 files on lb.wiki (2.290 files when posted):
- Free files (Category:All fräi Medien): 376 files (381 files when posted)
- Non-free files (Category:All net fräi Medien): 1.903 files (1.908 files when posted)
The reason the numbers does not match the total is that some files are in both categories. For example a photo of a statue. The statue is non-free but the photographer placed the photo under a free license. And a few might not have a license.
In a perfect world all the free files could be moved to Commons. Some files are allready there and could perhaps be deleted:
- Kategorie:Elo op Commons 2 files (1 file when posted)
- Kategorie:Elo op Commons mam selwechten Numm 9 files (7 files when posted)
But still some files remail here. In short they are probably still on lb.wiki because they can't be moved to Commons. The reason is most likely that they lack a good source, author or there is no permission.
Some of the files can perhaps be fixed if someone manage to contact the copyright holder and get a valid permission send to the OTRS system.
It hurts to delete files that are still in use but some wikis have decided that it is better to delete than to keep files that are not okay for Commons.
My first question is if you would like to keep such files and if yes all or should there be some criteria that have to be met before the file can be kept?
Then there are the non-free files. All of those files should have a valid rationale to be kept. Only way to find out is the check all the files one by one.
But that is not my topic for today.
En.wiki have some rules that:
- Orphan non-free files have to be deleted
- Non-free files may only be used in articles (meaning not on user pages and discussion pages)
- Old versions of non-free files have to be deleted or hidden
- Non-free files may only be small (for example width x length should max equal 100.000 pixels)
My second question is if all of those rules apply for lb.wiki too?
Keeping track of all those requirements may be hard without an easy way to find files that does not meet the requirements. The best is if you have local users that can check regulary.
If there are no users around that can do that then I may be able to check from time to time. I have made some queries that could help:
- Files with no license: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/45461 (most are probably in Special:UncategorizedFiles)
- Orphan non-free files: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/44024 (most are probably in Special:UnusedFiles)
- Non-free files used outside articles: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/53404
- Oversized non-free files (bigger than 100,000 pixels): https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/52838
- Non-free files with old versions: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/53406
I also help out on vi.wiki and uk.wiki and I managed to get a user from uk.wiki to use a bot on vi.wiki to reduce non-free files that are too big.
If lb.wiki have many files that are too big then I could perhaps get the user to help out here too.
But before that you need to decide how big files may be and perhaps clean up a bit in non-free files to make sure that there are not too many files that does not have a valid rationale.
My third question is if anyone here knows how to make lists like above and run a bot to reduce size of files and if not if you would perhaps be willing to (happy if) a user from another wiki used a bot here?
That was a long post. I know! But I think that it is important that community agree before any things are changed.
You are of course very welcome to discuss in Luxembourgish (Lëtzebuergesch). --MGA73 (Diskussioun) 14:48, 20. Mäe. 2021 (UTC)
Universal Code of Conduct – 2021 consultationsÄnneren
Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2Änneren
Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen
The Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) provides a universal baseline of acceptable behavior for the entire Wikimedia movement and all its projects. The project is currently in Phase 2, outlining clear enforcement pathways. You can read more about the whole project on its project page.
Drafting Committee: Call for applicationsÄnneren
The Wikimedia Foundation is recruiting volunteers to join a committee to draft how to make the code enforceable. Volunteers on the committee will commit between 2 and 6 hours per week from late April through July and again in October and November. It is important that the committee be diverse and inclusive, and have a range of experiences, including both experienced users and newcomers, and those who have received or responded to, as well as those who have been falsely accused of harassment.
To apply and learn more about the process, see Universal Code of Conduct/Drafting committee.
2021 community consultations: Notice and call for volunteers / translatorsÄnneren
From 5 April – 5 May 2021 there will be conversations on many Wikimedia projects about how to enforce the UCoC. We are looking for volunteers to translate key material, as well as to help host consultations on their own languages or projects using suggested key questions. If you are interested in volunteering for either of these roles, please contact us in whatever language you are most comfortable.
To learn more about this work and other conversations taking place, see Universal Code of Conduct/2021 consultations.
-- Xeno (WMF) (talk) 22:00, 5. Abr. 2021 (UTC)
Global bot policy changesÄnneren
Salut!
I apologize for sending a message in English. Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen. According to the list, your wiki project is currently opted in to the global bot policy. As such, I want to let you know about some changes that were made after the global RfC was closed.
- Global bots are now subject to a 2 week discussion, and it'll be publicized via a MassMessage list, available at Bot policy/New global bot discussion on Meta. Please subscribe yourself or your wiki if you are interested in new global bots proposals.
- For a bot to be considered for approval, it must demonstrate it is welcomed in multiple projects, and a good way to do that is to have the bot flag on at least 5 wikis for a single task.
- The bot operator should make sure to adhere to the wiki's preference as related to the use of the bot flag (i.e., if a wiki doesn't want a bot to use the flag as it edits, that should be followed).
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
—Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 18:48, 6. Abr. 2021 (UTC)
Line numbering coming soon to all wikisÄnneren
From April 15, you can enable line numbering in some wikitext editors - for now in the template namespace, coming to more namespaces soon. This will make it easier to detect line breaks and to refer to a particular line in discussions. These numbers will be shown if you enable the syntax highlighting feature (CodeMirror extension), which is supported in the 2010 and 2017 wikitext editors.
More information can be found on this project page. Everyone is invited to test the feature, and to give feedback on this talk page.
-- Johanna Strodt (WMDE) 15:09, 12. Abr. 2021 (UTC)
Suggested ValuesÄnneren
From April 29, it will be possible to suggest values for parameters in templates. Suggested values can be added to TemplateData and will then be shown as a drop-down list in VisualEditor. This allows template users to quickly select an appropriate value. This way, it prevents potential errors and reduces the effort needed to fill the template with values. It will still be possible to fill in values other than the suggested ones.
More information, including the supported parameter types and how to create suggested values: [1] [2]. Everyone is invited to test the feature, and to give feedback on this talk page.
Timur Vorkul (WMDE) 14:08, 22. Abr. 2021 (UTC)
RTL Bild vun der ChamberÄnneren
Moien, kuckt emol haut op der Haaptsäit vun RTL.lu:
do gesäit een eng Foto vun der Chamber, hallef verdeckt, déi vun der lbWP Chamber-Säit geknäipt ass. Och an den Owesnoriichte benotzen si reegelméisseg déi Foto... vertéischt ganz, dann no enger Sekonn oder esou schiiben se vu riets en Text iwwer d'Hallschent vum Bild. Iergendwéi schéngen si sech e bëssen ze genéieren :-) --Cayambe (Diskussioun) 07:57, 24. Abr. 2021 (UTC)
- Hunn dat an eis Presserevue gesat. --Sultan Edijingo (Diskussioun) 20:57, 24. Abr. 2021 (UTC)
- Dat mam Eraschwiewe vu riets vun engem Text oder soss Bildelementer schéngt en Tick vun hirem Grafikdesigner ze sinn, dat kënnt bal an all Noriichtesendung vir. --Zinneke (Diskussioun) 20:43, 26. Abr. 2021 (UTC)
Universal Code of Conduct News – Issue 1Änneren
Universal Code of Conduct News
Issue 1, June 2021Read the full newsletter
Welcome to the first issue of Universal Code of Conduct News! This newsletter will help Wikimedians stay involved with the development of the new code, and will distribute relevant news, research, and upcoming events related to the UCoC.
Please note, this is the first issue of UCoC Newsletter which is delivered to all subscribers and projects as an announcement of the initiative. If you want the future issues delivered to your talk page, village pumps, or any specific pages you find appropriate, you need to subscribe here.
You can help us by translating the newsletter issues in your languages to spread the news and create awareness of the new conduct to keep our beloved community safe for all of us. Please add your name here if you want to be informed of the draft issue to translate beforehand. Your participation is valued and appreciated.
- Affiliate consultations – Wikimedia affiliates of all sizes and types were invited to participate in the UCoC affiliate consultation throughout March and April 2021. (continue reading)
- 2021 key consultations – The Wikimedia Foundation held enforcement key questions consultations in April and May 2021 to request input about UCoC enforcement from the broader Wikimedia community. (continue reading)
- Roundtable discussions – The UCoC facilitation team hosted two 90-minute-long public roundtable discussions in May 2021 to discuss UCoC key enforcement questions. More conversations are scheduled. (continue reading)
- Phase 2 drafting committee – The drafting committee for the phase 2 of the UCoC started their work on 12 May 2021. Read more about their work. (continue reading)
- Diff blogs – The UCoC facilitators wrote several blog posts based on interesting findings and insights from each community during local project consultation that took place in the 1st quarter of 2021. (continue reading)
--MediaWiki message delivery (Diskussioun) 23:05, 11. Jun. 2021 (UTC)
Wikimania 2021: Individual Program SubmissionsÄnneren
Dear all,
Wikimania 2021 will be hosted virtually for the first time in the event's 15-year history. Since there is no in-person host, the event is being organized by a diverse group of Wikimedia volunteers that form the Core Organizing Team (COT) for Wikimania 2021.
Event Program - Individuals or a group of individuals can submit their session proposals to be a part of the program. There will be translation support for sessions provided in a number of languages. See more information here.
Below are some links to guide you through;
Please note that the deadline for submission is 18th June 2021.
Announcements- To keep up to date with the developments around Wikimania, the COT sends out weekly updates. You can view them in the Announcement section here.
Office Hour - If you are left with questions, the COT will be hosting some office hours (in multiple languages), in multiple time-zones, to answer any programming questions that you might have. Details can be found here.
Best regards,
MediaWiki message delivery (Diskussioun) 04:18, 16. Jun. 2021 (UTC)
On behalf of Wikimania 2021 Core Organizing Team
Geographesch NimmÄnneren
Dës Diskussioun gouf aus der Diskussioun:Haalsbaach (Bäerdref) heihi geknäipt well en allgemenge Standpunkt erwënscht ass.
Moien,
Firwat ginn hei Stroossennimm geännert?
E Stroossennumm gëtt per Gemengeregelement festgehalen, dann ass et, sou fannen ech, net un der Wikipedia, dat interpretéieren oder 'verbesseren' ze goen.
Um Geoportail sinn d'Nimm ze fannen, wéi s'offiziell heeschen. Hei iwregens eng Foto wou d'Schëld ze gesinn ass vun der Hammhafferstrooss. D'Biirkelterstrooss béit vun do of: File:Wayside cross and chapel Berdorf Hammhafferstrooss 2016-07.jpg.
Bescht Gréiss,
--Zinneke (Diskussioun) 16:17, 18. Jun. 2021 (UTC)
Moien och,
Et deet mer leed wann ech elo e bësselche bësseg ginn. Mä wéi alt schonn e puermol gesäit een hei nees datt wann een eppes un engem sengem Dada ännert datt dann iwwer eppes gemeckert gëtt, wat deem Mataarbechter virdru puupegal war. Bei iwwer dausend Ännerungen an Zäit vun 2 Joer déi am Sënn vun der neier Schreifweis bei Stroossennimm gemaach goufen huet keen eppes gesot. Dat wier awer intressant gewiescht well ech huelen un, datt dat Argument vum Gemengereglement iwwerall kéint zoutreffen. Fir lo nach bei den LOD argumentéieren ze goen an ze froen ob se och d'Buergermeeschtere gefrot hunn fir déi Nimm z'änneren, ass et wuel ze spéit. Et stinn iwwregens ganz vill Nimm um Geoportal déi nach den ale Schreifweisen entspriechen. Firwat wuel? Ma warscheinlech well déi besseres ze dinn hunn wéi lo all déi Nimm z'änneren. Am grousse Ganze goufen déi nei Reegele jo vun der Wikipedia akzeptéiert. Ech kann och dermat liewen datt mer dat bei Stroossen net maachen, da ginn ech all déi Verbesserungen zrécksetzen. Awer mer sollten entweder dat eent oder dat anert hunn a keen Duercherneen. Ech soen dat hei am Numm vun all de Wikipedianer déi bei de Verbesserunge vun de geographeschen Nimm gehollef hunn an hëllefen. --Les Meloures (Diskussioun) 19:17, 18. Jun. 2021 (UTC)
Moien. Mir krute kloer erkläert datt geografesch Nimm déi mat "er" ophalen ausernnee geschriwwe ginn.Dat fënns du am Reegelwierk. --Soued031 (Diskussioun) 19:29, 18. Jun. 2021 (UTC)
- PS: Den Artikel hei heescht Haalsbaach. Um Geoportal steet Halsbaach. Mir hunn en Artikel Bierkelt cf. LOD um Geoportal steet Birkelt. Um Geoportal steet Biirkelterstrooss, wat s du jo och sees awer an denger Beschrweiwung vun der Foto schreifs de selwer Bierkelterstrooss. U wat hale mer ons elo? Ech mengen eng Prinzipiendiskussioun op déi een an Zukunft kéint hiweise wier wichteg, fir datt net ëmmer nees al Zoppen opgewiermt ginn. --Les Meloures (Diskussioun) 08:05, 19. Jun. 2021 (UTC)
- Et wier an deem Sënn och gutt wa keng Verbesserunge méi vu geographeschen Nimm gemaach ginn bis mer e Konsens fonnt hunn. --Les Meloures (Diskussioun) 09:45, 19. Jun. 2021 (UTC)
- Gudden Owend,
- Ech hu mech och e bësse mat der Verbesserunge vun der Stroossennimm (oder aner geographeschen Nimm) beschäftegt. Wann ech an engem Artikel op en Numm stoussen, ersetzen ech e fir datt e konform mat den neie Reegelen ass. Wann et mech am Fong bei Nimm wéi Areler Strooss oder Lonkecher Strooss net stéiert, muss ech zouginn, datt ech et awer bosseg fanne bei Stroosse wéi z. B. dem Berliner Wee oder dem Hammer Dällchen. Et ass awer warscheinlech einfach d'Gewunnecht, well et laang anescht (falsch) geschriwwe gouf…
- Sou wéi mer chinesesch op chineesesch a schwedesch op schweedesch g'ännert hu fir konform mat den neie Reegelen ze sinn, sou solle mer et menger Meenung no och mat den Odonymme maachen.
- D'Nimm vun de Stroossen an enger Gemeng gi gemenkerhand vum Schäfferot (net iwwer e Gemengereglement) festgehalen. Ech weess z. B. och aus zouverlässeger Quell, datt an der Stad Lëtzebuerg déi Odonymmen déi op lëtzebuergesch sinn, vum CPLL op hier Schreifweis iwwerpréift a verbessert goufen, datt dat awer net heescht, datt elo all Stroosseschëlter verbessert ginn. Et wäert weiderhin Arelerstrooss oder Hammerdällchen um Schëld stoe bleiwen, bis vläicht eng Kéier neier gemaach ginn.
- Sou wéi mer an engem änleche Sujet och festgehalen haten déi richteg Reegel fir „Firmennimm“ unzewennen an z. B. Administration du cadastre et de la topographie ze schreiwen (mat klenge Buschtawen) amplaz vun der allgemeng gebrauchter falscher Schreifweis Administration du Cadastre et de la Topographie, sinn ech wéi gesot der Meenung, mer sollten eis fir d'geographesch Nimm un d'Reegelwierk vum LOD / CPLL halen, och wann déi net esou ass wéi op de meeschte Schëlter am Ländchen. GilPe (Diskussioun) 20:38, 19. Jun. 2021 (UTC)
- Gudden Owend, um Geoportail schaffe ganz léif Leit, déi sech opreege, mat dat, wat si vun de Gemengen erakréien. Heiansdo si Schreiffeeler dran, och a Nimm vun de Leit. Heiansdo steet et an der Décisioun vum Schäfferot anescht wéi um Géoportail, wéi op enger Säit vun der Strooss, wéi am PAG, wéi op der anerer Säit. Heiansdo schéckt d'Gemeng et richteg eran, mä et gëtt vertippt a falsch agedroen. All di Leit kachen eben och nëmme mat Waasser. Bei OpenStreetMap hu mir méi wéi 600 Verbesserungen - di Meescht sinn an der Lëscht hei: https://github.com/osmlu/csventrifuge/blob/master/rules/luxembourg_addresses/rue.csv. -- Stereo (Diskussioun) 22:18, 19. Jun. 2021 (UTC)
Editing news 2021 #2Änneren
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.
The key results were:
- Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
- The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.
These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.
Looking ahead
The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.
You can turn on "Diskussiouns-Geschier" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.
14:14, 24. Jun. 2021 (UTC)
Server switchÄnneren
Read this message in another language • Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen
The Wikimedia Foundation tests the switch between its first and secondary data centers. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to do a planned test. This test will show if they can reliably switch from one data centre to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.
Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop while the switch is made. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.
You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.
- You will not be able to edit for up to an hour on Tuesday, 29 June 2021. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (07:00 PDT, 10:00 EDT, 15:00 WEST/BST, 16:00 CEST, 19:30 IST, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 02:00 NZST on Wednesday 30 June).
- If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.
Other effects:
- Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
- There will be code freezes for the week of June 28. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.
SGrabarczuk (WMF) 01:19, 27. Jun. 2021 (UTC)