Wikipedia, déi fräi Enzyklopedie

Wikipedia:De Staminee/Archiv 2021

< Wikipedia:De Staminee

Hei ass d'Archiv vun den Diskussiounen um Staminee aus dem Joer 2021.

Kuckt och

änneren

Archiv: 2004 - 2005 - 2006 - 2007 - 2008 - 2009 - 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 - 2015 - 2016 - 2017 - 2018 - 2019 - 2020 - 2021 - 2022 - 2023 - 2024


Improving the translation support for Luxembourgish Wikipedia

änneren

Salut!

Apologies as this message is not in your native language, Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen.

Content translation has been successful in supporting the translation process on many Wikipedia communities, and we want to help additional wikis with the potential to grow using translation as part of a new initiative.


Content translation facilitates the creation of Wikipedia articles by translating content from other languages. It has been used already to create more than half a million articles. In addition, the tool provides mechanisms to encourage the creation of good quality content, preventing the publication of lightly edited machine translations. In general, our analysis shows that the translations produced are less likely to be deleted than the articles started from scratch.


Luxembourgish Wikipedia editors have used Content translation to create more than ninety articles. We think that there is potential to use translation to create more articles, expand existing ones, and attract new editors that learn how to make productive edits. Translation can help the community to reduce the language gap with other languages and grow the number of editors in a sustainable way. In order to achieve this goal, we want to collaborate with you to make Content translation more visible in the Luxembourgish Wikipedia and support new ways to translate.


As a first step, during the next weeks we plan to enable Content translation by default on Luxembourgish Wikipedia. That will make it easy for users to discover the tool through several entry points. However, users not interested in translation will still be able to disable it from their preferences.


Please feel free to share any comment in this conversation thread.


Thanks!

UOzurumba (WMF) (Diskussioun) 19:42, 7. Abr. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Moving Wikimania 2021 to a Virtual Event

änneren
 

Salut. Apologies if you are not reading this message in your native language. Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen. Merci!

Wikimania will be a virtual event this year, and hosted by a wide group of community members. Whenever the next in-person large gathering is possible again, the ESEAP Core Organizing Team will be in charge of it. Stay tuned for more information about how you can get involved in the planning process and other aspects of the event. Please read the longer version of this announcement on wikimedia-l.

ESEAP Core Organizing Team, Wikimania Steering Committee, Wikimedia Foundation Events Team, 15:15, 27. Jan. 2021 (UTC)

Project Grant Open Call

änneren

This is the announcement for the Project Grants program open call that started on January 11, with the submission deadline of February 10, 2021.
This first open call will be focussed on Community Organizing proposals. A second open call focused on research and software proposals is scheduled from February 15 with a submission deadline of March 16, 2021.

For the Round 1 open call, we invite you to propose grant applications that fall under community development and organizing (offline and online) categories. Project Grant funds are available to support individuals, groups, and organizations to implement new experiments and proven ideas, from organizing a better process on your wiki, coordinating a campaign or editathon series to providing other support for community building. We offer the following resources to help you plan your project and complete a grant proposal:

Program officers are also available to offer individualized proposal support upon request. Contact us if you would like feedback or more information.

We are excited to see your grant ideas that will support our community and make an impact on the future of Wikimedia projects. Put your idea into motion, and submit your proposal by February 10, 2021!

Please feel free to get in touch with questions about getting started with your grant application, or about serving on the Project Grants Committee. Contact us at projectgrants at wikimedia.org. Please help us translate this message to your local language. MediaWiki message delivery (Diskussioun) 08:01, 28. Jan. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

New Wikipedia Library Collections Available Now (February 2021)

änneren

Hello Wikimedians!

 
The TWL owl says sign up today!

The Wikipedia Library is announcing new free, full-access, accounts to reliable sources as part of our research access program. You can sign up to access research materials on the Library Card platform:

  • Taxmann – Taxation and law database
  • PNAS – Official journal of the National Academy of Sciences
  • EBSCO – New Arabic and Spanish language databases added

We have a wide array of other collections available, and a significant number now no longer require individual applications to access! Read more in our blog post.

Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects!

This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.

--12:57, 1. Feb. 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is back!

änneren

Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen

 

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Please support us in translating the project page and a banner message to help us spread the word in your native language.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (Diskussioun) 13:25, 6. Feb. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Feminism & Folklore 1 February - 31 March

änneren

Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen

Greetings!

You are invited to participate in Feminism and Folklore writing contest. This year Feminism and Folklore will focus on feminism, women's biographies and gender-focused topics for the project in league with Wiki Loves Folklore gender gap focus with folk culture theme on Wikipedia. folk activities, folk games, folk cuisine, folk wear, fairy tales, folk plays, folk arts, folk religion, mythology, etc.

You can help us in enriching the folklore documentation on Wikipedia from your region by creating or improving articles centered on folklore around the world, including, but not limited to folk festivals, folk dances, folk music, women and queer personalities in folklore, folk culture (folk artists, folk dancers, folk singers, folk musicians, folk game athletes, women in mythology, women warriors in folklore, witches and witch-hunting, fairy tales and more. You can contribute to new articles or translate from the list of suggested articles here.

You can also support us in translating the project page and help us spread the word in your native language.

Learn more about the contest and prizes from our project page. Thank you.

Feminism and Folklore team,

Joy Agyepong (talk) 02:40, 16. Feb. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Proposal: Set two-letter project shortcuts as alias to project namespace globally

änneren

Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen

Hello everyone,

I apologize for posting in English. I would like to inform everyone that I created a new global request for comment (GRFC) at Meta Wiki, which may affect your project: m:Requests for comment/Set short project namespace aliases by default globally.

In this GRFC, I propose that two-project shortcuts for project names will become a default alias for the project namespace. For instance, on all Wikipedias, WP will be an alias to the Wikipedia: namespace (and similar for other projects). Full list is available in the GRFC.

This is already the case for Wikivoyages, and many individual projects asked for this alias to be implemented. I believe this makes it easier to access the materials in the project namespace, as well as creating shortcuts like WP:NPOV, as well as helps new projects to use this feature, without having to figure out how to request site configuration changes first.

As far as I can see, Wikipedia currently does not have such an alias set. This means that such an alias will be set for you, if the GRFC is accepted by the global community.

I would like to ask all community members to participate in the request for comment at Meta-Wiki, see m:Requests for comment/Set short project namespace aliases by default globally.

Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions about this proposal.

Best regards,
--Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:12, 18. Feb. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Wikifunctions logo contest

änneren
Salut. Please help to choose a design concept for the logo of the new Wikifunctions wiki. Voting starts today and will be open for 2 weeks. If you would like to participate, then please learn more and vote now at Meta-Wiki. Merci! --Quiddity (WMF)

01:47, 2. Mäe. 2021 (UTC)

Checking files - what to do?

änneren

Hello from Denmark!

I hope you are all safe and happy!

You still remember me? :-)

I have not been very active on lb.wiki for some time because I took a wikibreak and because most of the files on lb.wiki have been checked.

Atm. there are 2.504 files on lb.wiki (2.290 files when posted):

The reason the numbers does not match the total is that some files are in both categories. For example a photo of a statue. The statue is non-free but the photographer placed the photo under a free license. And a few might not have a license.

In a perfect world all the free files could be moved to Commons. Some files are allready there and could perhaps be deleted:

But still some files remail here. In short they are probably still on lb.wiki because they can't be moved to Commons. The reason is most likely that they lack a good source, author or there is no permission.

Some of the files can perhaps be fixed if someone manage to contact the copyright holder and get a valid permission send to the OTRS system.

It hurts to delete files that are still in use but some wikis have decided that it is better to delete than to keep files that are not okay for Commons.

My first question is if you would like to keep such files and if yes all or should there be some criteria that have to be met before the file can be kept?

Then there are the non-free files. All of those files should have a valid rationale to be kept. Only way to find out is the check all the files one by one.

But that is not my topic for today.

En.wiki have some rules that:

  1. Orphan non-free files have to be deleted
  2. Non-free files may only be used in articles (meaning not on user pages and discussion pages)
  3. Old versions of non-free files have to be deleted or hidden
  4. Non-free files may only be small (for example width x length should max equal 100.000 pixels)

My second question is if all of those rules apply for lb.wiki too?

Keeping track of all those requirements may be hard without an easy way to find files that does not meet the requirements. The best is if you have local users that can check regulary.

If there are no users around that can do that then I may be able to check from time to time. I have made some queries that could help:

  1. Files with no license: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/45461 (most are probably in Special:UncategorizedFiles)
  2. Orphan non-free files: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/44024 (most are probably in Special:UnusedFiles)
  3. Non-free files used outside articles: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/53404
  4. Oversized non-free files (bigger than 100,000 pixels): https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/52838
  5. Non-free files with old versions: https://quarry.wmflabs.org/query/53406

I also help out on vi.wiki and uk.wiki and I managed to get a user from uk.wiki to use a bot on vi.wiki to reduce non-free files that are too big.

If lb.wiki have many files that are too big then I could perhaps get the user to help out here too.

But before that you need to decide how big files may be and perhaps clean up a bit in non-free files to make sure that there are not too many files that does not have a valid rationale.

My third question is if anyone here knows how to make lists like above and run a bot to reduce size of files and if not if you would perhaps be willing to (happy if) a user from another wiki used a bot here?

That was a long post. I know! But I think that it is important that community agree before any things are changed.

You are of course very welcome to discuss in Luxembourgish (Lëtzebuergesch). --MGA73 (Diskussioun) 14:48, 20. Mäe. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Universal Code of Conduct – 2021 consultations

änneren

Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2

änneren

Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen

The Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) provides a universal baseline of acceptable behavior for the entire Wikimedia movement and all its projects. The project is currently in Phase 2, outlining clear enforcement pathways. You can read more about the whole project on its project page.

Drafting Committee: Call for applications

änneren

The Wikimedia Foundation is recruiting volunteers to join a committee to draft how to make the code enforceable. Volunteers on the committee will commit between 2 and 6 hours per week from late April through July and again in October and November. It is important that the committee be diverse and inclusive, and have a range of experiences, including both experienced users and newcomers, and those who have received or responded to, as well as those who have been falsely accused of harassment.

To apply and learn more about the process, see Universal Code of Conduct/Drafting committee.

2021 community consultations: Notice and call for volunteers / translators

änneren

From 5 April – 5 May 2021 there will be conversations on many Wikimedia projects about how to enforce the UCoC. We are looking for volunteers to translate key material, as well as to help host consultations on their own languages or projects using suggested key questions. If you are interested in volunteering for either of these roles, please contact us in whatever language you are most comfortable.

To learn more about this work and other conversations taking place, see Universal Code of Conduct/2021 consultations.

-- Xeno (WMF) (talk) 22:00, 5. Abr. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Global bot policy changes

änneren

Salut!

I apologize for sending a message in English. Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen. According to the list, your wiki project is currently opted in to the global bot policy. As such, I want to let you know about some changes that were made after the global RfC was closed.

  • Global bots are now subject to a 2 week discussion, and it'll be publicized via a MassMessage list, available at Bot policy/New global bot discussion on Meta. Please subscribe yourself or your wiki if you are interested in new global bots proposals.
  • For a bot to be considered for approval, it must demonstrate it is welcomed in multiple projects, and a good way to do that is to have the bot flag on at least 5 wikis for a single task.
  • The bot operator should make sure to adhere to the wiki's preference as related to the use of the bot flag (i.e., if a wiki doesn't want a bot to use the flag as it edits, that should be followed).

Thank you for your time.

Best regards,
—Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 18:48, 6. Abr. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Line numbering coming soon to all wikis

änneren
 
Example

From April 15, you can enable line numbering in some wikitext editors - for now in the template namespace, coming to more namespaces soon. This will make it easier to detect line breaks and to refer to a particular line in discussions. These numbers will be shown if you enable the syntax highlighting feature (CodeMirror extension), which is supported in the 2010 and 2017 wikitext editors.

More information can be found on this project page. Everyone is invited to test the feature, and to give feedback on this talk page.

-- Johanna Strodt (WMDE) 15:09, 12. Abr. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Suggested Values

änneren

From April 29, it will be possible to suggest values for parameters in templates. Suggested values can be added to TemplateData and will then be shown as a drop-down list in VisualEditor. This allows template users to quickly select an appropriate value. This way, it prevents potential errors and reduces the effort needed to fill the template with values. It will still be possible to fill in values other than the suggested ones.

More information, including the supported parameter types and how to create suggested values: [1] [2]. Everyone is invited to test the feature, and to give feedback on this talk page.

Timur Vorkul (WMDE) 14:08, 22. Abr. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

RTL Bild vun der Chamber

änneren

Moien, kuckt emol haut op der Haaptsäit vun RTL.lu:
do gesäit een eng Foto vun der Chamber, hallef verdeckt, déi vun der lbWP Chamber-Säit geknäipt ass. Och an den Owesnoriichte benotzen si reegelméisseg déi Foto... vertéischt ganz, dann no enger Sekonn oder esou schiiben se vu riets en Text iwwer d'Hallschent vum Bild. Iergendwéi schéngen si sech e bëssen ze genéieren :-) --Cayambe (Diskussioun) 07:57, 24. Abr. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Hunn dat an eis Presserevue gesat. --Sultan Edijingo (Diskussioun) 20:57, 24. Abr. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]
Dat mam Eraschwiewe vu riets vun engem Text oder soss Bildelementer schéngt en Tick vun hirem Grafikdesigner ze sinn, dat kënnt bal an all Noriichtesendung vir. --Zinneke (Diskussioun) 20:43, 26. Abr. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Universal Code of Conduct News – Issue 1

änneren

Universal Code of Conduct News
Issue 1, June 2021Read the full newsletter

Welcome to the first issue of Universal Code of Conduct News! This newsletter will help Wikimedians stay involved with the development of the new code, and will distribute relevant news, research, and upcoming events related to the UCoC.

Please note, this is the first issue of UCoC Newsletter which is delivered to all subscribers and projects as an announcement of the initiative. If you want the future issues delivered to your talk page, village pumps, or any specific pages you find appropriate, you need to subscribe here.

You can help us by translating the newsletter issues in your languages to spread the news and create awareness of the new conduct to keep our beloved community safe for all of us. Please add your name here if you want to be informed of the draft issue to translate beforehand. Your participation is valued and appreciated.

  • Affiliate consultations – Wikimedia affiliates of all sizes and types were invited to participate in the UCoC affiliate consultation throughout March and April 2021. (continue reading)
  • 2021 key consultations – The Wikimedia Foundation held enforcement key questions consultations in April and May 2021 to request input about UCoC enforcement from the broader Wikimedia community. (continue reading)
  • Roundtable discussions – The UCoC facilitation team hosted two 90-minute-long public roundtable discussions in May 2021 to discuss UCoC key enforcement questions. More conversations are scheduled. (continue reading)
  • Phase 2 drafting committee – The drafting committee for the phase 2 of the UCoC started their work on 12 May 2021. Read more about their work. (continue reading)
  • Diff blogs – The UCoC facilitators wrote several blog posts based on interesting findings and insights from each community during local project consultation that took place in the 1st quarter of 2021. (continue reading)

--MediaWiki message delivery (Diskussioun) 23:05, 11. Jun. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Wikimania 2021: Individual Program Submissions

änneren
 

Dear all,

Wikimania 2021 will be hosted virtually for the first time in the event's 15-year history. Since there is no in-person host, the event is being organized by a diverse group of Wikimedia volunteers that form the Core Organizing Team (COT) for Wikimania 2021.

Event Program - Individuals or a group of individuals can submit their session proposals to be a part of the program. There will be translation support for sessions provided in a number of languages. See more information here.

Below are some links to guide you through;

Please note that the deadline for submission is 18th June 2021.

Announcements- To keep up to date with the developments around Wikimania, the COT sends out weekly updates. You can view them in the Announcement section here.

Office Hour - If you are left with questions, the COT will be hosting some office hours (in multiple languages), in multiple time-zones, to answer any programming questions that you might have. Details can be found here.

Best regards,

MediaWiki message delivery (Diskussioun) 04:18, 16. Jun. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

On behalf of Wikimania 2021 Core Organizing Team


Geographesch Nimm

änneren

Dës Diskussioun gouf aus der Diskussioun:Haalsbaach (Bäerdref) heihi geknäipt well en allgemenge Standpunkt erwënscht ass.


Moien,

Firwat ginn hei Stroossennimm geännert?

E Stroossennumm gëtt per Gemengeregelement festgehalen, dann ass et, sou fannen ech, net un der Wikipedia, dat interpretéieren oder 'verbesseren' ze goen.

Um Geoportail sinn d'Nimm ze fannen, wéi s'offiziell heeschen. Hei iwregens eng Foto wou d'Schëld ze gesinn ass vun der Hammhafferstrooss. D'Biirkelterstrooss béit vun do of: File:Wayside cross and chapel Berdorf Hammhafferstrooss 2016-07.jpg.

Bescht Gréiss,

--Zinneke (Diskussioun) 16:17, 18. Jun. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]


Moien och,

Et deet mer leed wann ech elo e bësselche bësseg ginn. Mä wéi alt schonn e puermol gesäit een hei nees datt wann een eppes un engem sengem Dada ännert datt dann iwwer eppes gemeckert gëtt, wat deem Mataarbechter virdru puupegal war. Bei iwwer dausend Ännerungen an Zäit vun 2 Joer déi am Sënn vun der neier Schreifweis bei Stroossennimm gemaach goufen huet keen eppes gesot. Dat wier awer intressant gewiescht well ech huelen un, datt dat Argument vum Gemengereglement iwwerall kéint zoutreffen. Fir lo nach bei den LOD argumentéieren ze goen an ze froen ob se och d'Buergermeeschtere gefrot hunn fir déi Nimm z'änneren, ass et wuel ze spéit. Et stinn iwwregens ganz vill Nimm um Geoportal déi nach den ale Schreifweisen entspriechen. Firwat wuel? Ma warscheinlech well déi besseres ze dinn hunn wéi lo all déi Nimm z'änneren. Am grousse Ganze goufen déi nei Reegele jo vun der Wikipedia akzeptéiert. Ech kann och dermat liewen datt mer dat bei Stroossen net maachen, da ginn ech all déi Verbesserungen zrécksetzen. Awer mer sollten entweder dat eent oder dat anert hunn a keen Duercherneen. Ech soen dat hei am Numm vun all de Wikipedianer déi bei de Verbesserunge vun de geographeschen Nimm gehollef hunn an hëllefen. --Les Meloures (Diskussioun) 19:17, 18. Jun. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Moien. Mir krute kloer erkläert datt geografesch Nimm déi mat "er" ophalen ausernnee geschriwwe ginn.Dat fënns du am Reegelwierk. --Soued031 (Diskussioun) 19:29, 18. Jun. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]


PS: Den Artikel hei heescht Haalsbaach. Um Geoportal steet Halsbaach. Mir hunn en Artikel Bierkelt cf. LOD um Geoportal steet Birkelt. Um Geoportal steet Biirkelterstrooss, wat s du jo och sees awer an denger Beschrweiwung vun der Foto schreifs de selwer Bierkelterstrooss. U wat hale mer ons elo? Ech mengen eng Prinzipiendiskussioun op déi een an Zukunft kéint hiweise wier wichteg, fir datt net ëmmer nees al Zoppen opgewiermt ginn. --Les Meloures (Diskussioun) 08:05, 19. Jun. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]
Et wier an deem Sënn och gutt wa keng Verbesserunge méi vu geographeschen Nimm gemaach ginn bis mer e Konsens fonnt hunn. --Les Meloures (Diskussioun) 09:45, 19. Jun. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]
Gudden Owend,
Ech hu mech och e bësse mat der Verbesserunge vun der Stroossennimm (oder aner geographeschen Nimm) beschäftegt. Wann ech an engem Artikel op en Numm stoussen, ersetzen ech e fir datt e konform mat den neie Reegelen ass. Wann et mech am Fong bei Nimm wéi Areler Strooss oder Lonkecher Strooss net stéiert, muss ech zouginn, datt ech et awer bosseg fanne bei Stroosse wéi z. B. dem Berliner Wee oder dem Hammer Dällchen. Et ass awer warscheinlech einfach d'Gewunnecht, well et laang anescht (falsch) geschriwwe gouf…
Sou wéi mer chinesesch op chineesesch a schwedesch op schweedesch g'ännert hu fir konform mat den neie Reegelen ze sinn, sou solle mer et menger Meenung no och mat den Odonymme maachen.
D'Nimm vun de Stroossen an enger Gemeng gi gemenkerhand vum Schäfferot (net iwwer e Gemengereglement) festgehalen. Ech weess z. B. och aus zouverlässeger Quell, datt an der Stad Lëtzebuerg déi Odonymmen déi op lëtzebuergesch sinn, vum CPLL op hier Schreifweis iwwerpréift a verbessert goufen, datt dat awer net heescht, datt elo all Stroosseschëlter verbessert ginn. Et wäert weiderhin Arelerstrooss oder Hammerdällchen um Schëld stoe bleiwen, bis vläicht eng Kéier neier gemaach ginn.
Sou wéi mer an engem änleche Sujet och festgehalen haten déi richteg Reegel fir „Firmennimm“ unzewennen an z. B. Administration du cadastre et de la topographie ze schreiwen (mat klenge Buschtawen) amplaz vun der allgemeng gebrauchter falscher Schreifweis Administration du Cadastre et de la Topographie, sinn ech wéi gesot der Meenung, mer sollten eis fir d'geographesch Nimm un d'Reegelwierk vum LOD / CPLL halen, och wann déi net esou ass wéi op de meeschte Schëlter am Ländchen. GilPe (Diskussioun) 20:38, 19. Jun. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]
Gudden Owend, um Geoportail schaffe ganz léif Leit, déi sech opreege, mat dat, wat si vun de Gemengen erakréien. Heiansdo si Schreiffeeler dran, och a Nimm vun de Leit. Heiansdo steet et an der Décisioun vum Schäfferot anescht wéi um Géoportail, wéi op enger Säit vun der Strooss, wéi am PAG, wéi op der anerer Säit. Heiansdo schéckt d'Gemeng et richteg eran, mä et gëtt vertippt a falsch agedroen. All di Leit kachen eben och nëmme mat Waasser. Bei OpenStreetMap hu mir méi wéi 600 Verbesserungen - di Meescht sinn an der Lëscht hei: https://github.com/osmlu/csventrifuge/blob/master/rules/luxembourg_addresses/rue.csv. -- Stereo (Diskussioun) 22:18, 19. Jun. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Editing news 2021 #2

änneren

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

 
When newcomers had the Reply tool and tried to post on a talk page, they were more successful at posting a comment. (Source)

Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:

  • Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
  • The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Diskussiouns-Geschier" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

14:14, 24. Jun. 2021 (UTC)

Server switch

änneren

Read this message in another language • Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen

The Wikimedia Foundation tests the switch between its first and secondary data centers. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to do a planned test. This test will show if they can reliably switch from one data centre to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.

Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop while the switch is made. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.

You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.

  • You will not be able to edit for up to an hour on Tuesday, 29 June 2021. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (07:00 PDT, 10:00 EDT, 15:00 WEST/BST, 16:00 CEST, 19:30 IST, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 02:00 NZST on Wednesday 30 June).
  • If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.

Other effects:

  • Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
  • There will be code freezes for the week of June 28. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.
This project may be postponed if necessary. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. Any changes will be announced in the schedule. There will be more notifications about this. A banner will be displayed on all wikis 30 minutes before this operation happens. Please share this information with your community.

SGrabarczuk (WMF) 01:19, 27. Jun. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

New Wikipedia Library collections and design update (August 2021)

änneren

Hello Wikimedians!

 
The TWL OWL says log in today!

The Wikipedia Library is pleased to announce the addition of new collections, alongside a new interface design. New collections include:

Additionally, De Gruyter and Nomos have been centralised from their previous on-wiki signup location on the German Wikipedia. Many other collections are freely available by simply logging in to The Wikipedia Library with your Wikimedia login!

We are also excited to announce that the first version of a new design for My Library was deployed this week. We will be iterating on this design with more features over the coming weeks. Read more on the project page on Meta.

Lastly, an Echo notification will begin rolling out soon to notify eligible editors about the library (T132084). If you can translate the notification please do so at TranslateWiki!

--The Wikipedia Library Team 13:23, 11. Aug. 2021 (UTC)

This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.

Universal Code of Conduct - Enforcement draft guidelines review

änneren

The Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee would like comments about the enforcement draft guidelines for the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC). This review period is planned to begin 17 August 2021.

Community and staff members collaborated to develop these draft guidelines based on consultations, discussions, and research. These guidelines are not final but you can help move the progress forward. Provide comments about these guidelines by 17 October 2021. The committee will be revising the guidelines based upon community input.

Everyone may share comments in a number of places. Facilitators welcome comments in any language on the draft review talk page or by email. Comments can also be shared on talk pages of translations, at local discussions, or during round-table discussions and conversation hours.

There are planned live discussions about the UCoC enforcement draft guidelines:

The facilitation team supporting this review period hopes to reach a large number of communities. Having a shared understanding is important. If you do not see a conversation happening in your community, please organize a discussion. Facilitators can assist you in setting up the conversations.

Discussions will be summarized and presented to the drafting committee every two weeks. The summaries will be published here.

Please let me know if you have any questions about the draft, the community consultation or the UCoC.
Many thanks! --Civvi (WMF) (Diskussioun) 15:30, 17. Aug. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Universal Code of Conduct - Überprüfung der Umsetzungsrichtlinien

änneren

Das Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 Entwurfskomitee bittet um Stellungnahmen zum Enforcement-Leitlinienentwurf für den Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC). Dieser Überprüfungszeitraum soll am 17. August 2021 beginnen und läuft bis zum 17. Oktober 2021.

Diese Leitlinien sind nicht endgültig - du kannst helfen, ihre Entwicklung zu verbessern. Das Komitee wird die Leitlinien basierend auf den Rückmeldungen der Community überarbeiten.

Kommentare können in jeder Sprache auf der Draft Review Talk Page und Multiple other venues geteilt werden. Community-Mitglieder sind eingeladen, eigenständig Unterhaltungen in ihren Communities zu organisieren.

Es sind Live-Diskussionen über den Entwurf der UCoC-Umsetzungsleitlinien geplant:

Wikimania 2021 session - 16 August @ 11:00 UTC - 11:45 UTC
Gesprächsstunden - 24. August, 31. August, 7. September um 03:00 UTC & 14:00 UTC
Gespräche am runden Tisch - 18 September @ 03:00 UTC & 15:00 UTC

Zusammenfassungen der Diskussionen werden alle zwei Wochen hier gepostet.

Bitte melde dich bei mir, falls du Fragen hast.

Xeno (WMF) 23:19, 17. Aug. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees election has come to an end

änneren

Thank you for participating in the 2021 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees election! Voting closed August 31 at 23:59. The official data, including the four most voted candidates, will be announced as soon as the Elections Committee completes their review of the ballots. The official announcement of the new trustees appointed will happen later, once the selected candidates have been confirmed by the Board.

6,946 community members from 216 wiki projects have voted. This makes 10.2% global participation, 1.1% higher than in the last Board elections. In 2017, 5167 people from 202 wiki projects cast their vote. A full analysis is planned to be published in a few days when the confirmed results are announced. In the meantime, you can check the data produced during the election.

Diversity was an important goal with these elections. Messages about the Board election were translated into 61 languages. This outreach worked well. There were 70 communities with eligible voters voting in this election for the first time. With your help, next year’s Board of Trustees election will be even better.

10:03, 2. Sep. 2021 (UTC)

The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey will happen in January

änneren

Hello everyone,

We hope all of you are as well and safe as possible during these trying times! We wanted to share some news about a change to the Community Wishlist Survey 2022. We would like to hear your opinions as well.

Summary:

We will be running the Community Wishlist Survey 2022 in January 2022. We need more time to work on the 2021 wishes. We also need time to prepare some changes to the Wishlist 2022. In the meantime, you can use a dedicated sandbox to leave early ideas for the 2022 wishes.

Proposing and wish-fulfillment will happen during the same year

änneren

In the past, the Community Tech team has run the Community Wishlist Survey for the following year in November of the prior year. For example, we ran the Wishlist for 2021 in November 2020. That worked well a few years ago. At that time, we used to start working on the Wishlist soon after the results of the voting were published.

However, in 2021, there was a delay between the voting and the time when we could start working on the new wishes. Until July 2021, we were working on wishes from the Wishlist for 2020.

We hope having the Wishlist 2022 in January 2022 will be more intuitive. This will also give us time to fulfill more wishes from the 2021 Wishlist.

Encouraging wider participation from historically excluded communities

änneren

We are thinking how to make the Wishlist easier to participate in. We want to support more translations, and encourage under-resourced communities to be more active. We would like to have some time to make these changes.

A new space to talk to us about priorities and wishes not granted yet

änneren

We will have gone 365 days without a Wishlist. We encourage you to approach us. We hope to hear from you in the talk page, but we also hope to see you at our bi-monthly Talk to Us meetings! These will be hosted at two different times friendly to time zones around the globe.

We will begin our first meeting September 15th at 23:00 UTC. More details about the agenda and format coming soon!

Brainstorm and draft proposals before the proposal phase

änneren

If you have early ideas for wishes, you can use the new Community Wishlist Survey sandbox. This way, you will not forget about these before January 2022. You will be able to come back and refine your ideas. Remember, edits in the sandbox don't count as wishes!

Feedback

änneren
  • What should we do to improve the Wishlist pages?
  • How would you like to use our new sandbox?
  • What, if any, risks do you foresee in our decision to change the date of the Wishlist 2022?
  • What will help more people participate in the Wishlist 2022?

Answer on the talk page (in any language you prefer) or at our Talk to Us meetings.

SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 00:23, 7. Sep. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Call for Candidates for the Movement Charter Drafting Committee ending 14 September 2021

änneren

Im Rahmen des Movement-Strategy-Prozesses werden Kandidierende für die Schreibgruppe (drafting committee) der Movement Charta gesucht. Die Kandidierenden-Suche beginnt am 2. August und läuft bis zum 14. September 2021.

Die Schreibgruppe wird um die 15 Mitglieder haben, die idealerweise die Vielfalt des Wikimedia-Movements repräsentieren, wie Geschlechter, Sprachen, geographische Herkunft, Erfahrung. Dazu gehört ebenfalls bspw. Engagement in den Onlineprojekten, Wikimedia-Organisationen und -Gruppen oder der Wikimedia Foundation.

Englischkenntnisse sind nicht erforderlich, um Mitglied zu werden. Bei Bedarf wird Übersetzungs- und Dolmetschunterstützung angeboten. Mitglieder können eine Aufwandsentschädigung erhalten, um die Teilnahmekosten auszugleichen. Sie beträgt alle zwei Monate 100 US-Dollar.

Wir suchen Mitglieder, die über einige dieser Fähigkeiten oder Erfahrungen verfügen:

  • Wissen, wie man kollaborativ schreibt. (nachgewiesene Erfahrung ist ein Plus)
  • Kompromissbereit sind.
  • Sich auf Inklusion und Vielfalt konzentrieren.
  • Kenntnisse über Community-Konsultationen (z.B. Meinungsbilder) haben.
  • Erfahrung in interkultureller Kommunikation mitbringen.
  • Erfahrungen in der Leitung oder Organisation von Non-Profit-Organisationen oder Communities haben.
  • Erfahrung im Verhandeln mit verschiedenen Parteien haben.

Es wird davon ausgegangen, dass das Komitee anfangs 15 Personen umfasst. Wenn es 20 oder mehr Kandidierende gibt, findet ein gemischtes Wahl- und Auswahlverfahren statt. Gibt es 19 oder weniger Kandidierende, findet das Auswahlverfahren ohne Wahl statt.

Möchtest du dich gerne in diesem Prozess engagieren? Dann reiche deine Kandidatur hier ein. Wenn du Fragen hast, schreib gerne an strategy2030 wikimedia.org.

Xeno (WMF) 17:01, 10. Sep. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Server switch

änneren

Read this message in another language • Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen

The Wikimedia Foundation tests the switch between its first and secondary data centers. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to do a planned test. This test will show if they can reliably switch from one data centre to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.

They will switch all traffic back to the primary data center on Tuesday, 14 September 2021.

Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop while the switch is made. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.

You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.

  • You will not be able to edit for up to an hour on Tuesday, 14 September 2021. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (07:00 PDT, 10:00 EDT, 15:00 WEST/BST, 16:00 CEST, 19:30 IST, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 02:00 NZST on Wednesday, 15 September).
  • If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.

Other effects:

  • Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
  • We expect the code deployments to happen as any other week. However, some case-by-case code freezes could punctually happen if the operation require them afterwards.
This project may be postponed if necessary. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. Any changes will be announced in the schedule. There will be more notifications about this. A banner will be displayed on all wikis 30 minutes before this operation happens. Please share this information with your community.

SGrabarczuk (WMF) (Diskussioun) 00:45, 11. Sep. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Talk to the Community Tech

änneren
 

Read this message in another language • Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen

Hello!

As we have recently announced, we, the team working on the Community Wishlist Survey, would like to invite you to an online meeting with us. It will take place on September 15th, 23:00 UTC on Zoom, and will last an hour. Click here to join.

Agenda

Format

The meeting will not be recorded or streamed. Notes without attribution will be taken and published on Meta-Wiki. The presentation (first three points in the agenda) will be given in English.

We can answer questions asked in English, French, Polish, and Spanish. If you would like to ask questions in advance, add them on the Community Wishlist Survey talk page or send to sgrabarczuk@wikimedia.org.

Natalia Rodriguez (the Community Tech manager) will be hosting this meeting.

Invitation link

See you! SGrabarczuk (WMF) (Diskussioun) 03:03, 11. Sep. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Select You the question statements for candidates of Drafting Committee Movement Charter

änneren

Into 2021-10-04 11:59:59 UTC you can select question statements for the candidates of Drafting Committee Movement Charter. ✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (Diskussioun) 23:08, 29. Sep. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Lasst uns über die Desktop-Verbesserungen sprechen

änneren
 

Hallo!

Habt ihr bemerkt, dass einige Wikis eine veränderte Desktop-Oberfläche haben? Interessiert ihr euch für die nächsten Schritte? Vielleicht habt ihr Fragen oder Ideen zum Design oder technischen Details?

Nehmt an einem Online-Treffen mit dem Team, das an den Desktop-Verbesserungen arbeitet, teil! Es findet statt am 12. Oktober um 18:00 MESZ auf Zoom. Es wird eine Stunde dauern. Klicke hier, um teilzunehmen.

Agenda

  • Informationen zu den letzten Entwicklungen
  • Sticky Header - Präsentation der Demo-Version
  • Fragen und Antworten, Diskussion

Format

Das Treffen wird nicht aufgezeichnet oder gestreamt. Notizen werden in einem Google Doc aufgezeichnet. Der Präsentationsteil (die ersten zwei Punkte der Agenda) findet auf Englisch statt.

Wir können Fragen beantworten, die auf Englisch, Französisch, Polnisch und Spanisch gestellt werden. Wenn du im Voraus Fragen stellen möchtest, kannst du diese auf der Diskussionsseite stellen oder an sgrabarczuk@wikimedia.org senden.

Olga Vasileva (Team-Manager) veranstaltet das Treffen.

Einladungslink

Bis dann! SGrabarczuk (WMF) 22:43, 4. Okt. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Die Abstimmung für die Wahl der Mitglieder des Komitees zum Entwurf der Movement Charter ist jetzt eröffnet

änneren
An anere Sproochen • Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen

Voting for the election for the members for the Movement Charter drafting committee is now open. In total, 70 Wikimedians from around the world are running for 7 seats in these elections.

Voting is open from October 12 to October 24, 2021.

The committee will consist of 15 members in total: The online communities vote for 7 members, 6 members will be selected by the Wikimedia affiliates through a parallel process, and 2 members will be appointed by the Wikimedia Foundation. The plan is to assemble the committee by November 1, 2021.

Learn about each candidate to inform your vote in the language that you prefer: <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Candidates>

Gitt méi iwwer de Redaktiouns-Comité gewuer: <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee>

We are piloting a voting advice application for this election. Click yourself through the tool and you will see which candidate is closest to you! Check at <https://mcdc-election-compass.toolforge.org/>

Liest déi komplett Annonce: <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Elections>

Go vote at SecurePoll on: <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Movement_Charter/Drafting_Committee/Elections>

Bescht Gréiss,

D'Ekipp vun der Strategie an der Gouvernance vum Mouvement, Wikimedia Foundation


Xeno (WMF) 02:22, 14. Okt. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Das ist das neue Entwurfskomitee der Movement Charter

änneren
Méi Sproochen • Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen

Die Wahl- und Auswahlverfahren des Entwurfskomitees für die Movement Charter sind abgeschlossen.

Das Komitee wird demnächst zusammentreten, um seine Arbeit aufzunehmen. Das Komitee kann bis zu drei weitere Mitglieder ernennen, um Lücken in Bezug auf Vielfalt und Fachwissen zu schließen.

Wenn du daran interessiert bist, dich am Movement Charter-Entwurfsprozess zu beteiligen, verfolge die Updates auf Meta oder tritt der Telegram-Gruppe bei.

Mit Dank vom Movement Strategy und Governance-Team

DBarthel (WMF) 00:00, 2. Nov. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Filmkategorien

änneren

Eng Prinzipiefro bei de Kategorien :

An der däitscher , englescher a franséischer Wiki ass en Documentaire, e Filmdrama, e Kaméidisfilm och gläichzäiteg en däitsche, franséische oder englesche Film firwat däerf dat an der lëtzebuergescher Wiki net méi esou sinn (z.B. Ashcan (Film) an anerer) wou d’Kategorie lëtzebuergesche Film geläscht gouf.

An den frieme Wikien ass dat anescht

z. B.: Mein Kampf en Documentaire vum Erwin Leiser figuréiert an der däitscher, an der franséischer an an der englescher Wiki an 2 Kategorien als Documentaire an als Film vum Land wou hie gedréit gouf oder en annert Beispill den Documentaire Flying Clipper aew

An d'Kategorie Lëtzebuergesch Filmer gehéieren all Filmer déi hei zu Lëtzebuerg produzéiert goufen , duerno kommen d'Ënnerkategorien wéi Documentairen, Kaméidisfilmer, Kriminalfilmer etc. soss huet een déi Filmer déi a Lëtzebuerg produzéiert goufen ni zesumme stoen.

Leien ech do falsch mat menger Meenung?. Ech erwaarden är Kommentairen.

18:30, 14. Dez. 2021 (UTC)Johnny Chicago (Diskussioun)

Et war op jiddwer Fall an deem Sënn mol sou am Ufank ausgemaach sinn. Et ass menger Meenung och méi praktesch wann se duebel kategoriséiert sinn fir se all beieneen z'erfaassen. Et ass jo och net déi eenzeg Iwwerkategorie déi sou funktionnéiert. Ech fannen et och droleg datt eppes wat lo 15 Joer vun der Gemeinschaft sou akzeptéiert war, elo op eemol net méi gutt soll sinn. --Les Meloures (Diskussioun) 19:32, 14. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Hallo, ech huelen un, dat ass op mech bezunn. Firwat musst dir dann ëmmer esou extrem passiv-aggressiv reagéieren? Mengt dir net, datt dir méi wät kommt, wann dir dat op eng méi konstruktiv Manéier zum Ausdrock bréngt? Johnny Chicago, du häss mir besser direkt geschriwwen, ech gesinn déi Diskussioun hei elo eréischt. Ech hat e Mangel u Koherenz gesinn, well e puer Filmer just an enger Ënnerkategorie vun der "Kategorie:Lëtzebuergesch Filmer" klasséiert waren, an anerer mat der Ënner- an der Uewerkategorie (zB "Kategorie:Lëtzebuergesch Filmer" + "Kategorie:Lëtzebuergesch Kuerzfilmer").

Ech verstinn deng Argumentatioun, a sinn och net dogéint, mee meng Fro ass: Ech hunn zum Beispill In a Dark Place. Misst deen där Logik no folgend Kategorien hunn: "Kategorie: Lëtzebuergesch Horrorfilmer" + "Kategorie:Lëtzebuergesch Filmer" + "Kategorie:Horrorfilmer"? Oder nëmmen "Kategorie: Lëtzebuergesch Horrorfilmer" + "Kategorie:Lëtzebuergesch Filmer"? Fir mech wier et logescherweis dann och #1, mee dat ass bis elo net de Fall. Dat heescht, ech sinn net géint dat wats du schreifs, mee da misst dat just koherent applizéiert ginn.

Wéis du warscheinlech gesinn hues, ginn ech grad iwwer all d'lëtzebuergesch Filmer, momentan haaptsächlech iwwer d'Documentairen. De Gros vun den Artikele si just Skeletter. Amplaz ëmmer alles ze attackéieren, géif ech et net schlecht fannen, Problemer direkt unzeschwätzen (op eng konstruktiv Manéier!), an da kënne mir probéieren, eis Energie an d'Ausbaue/Aktualiséiere vun Artikelen investéieren. Perséinlech fannen ech Passiv-Aggressivitéit zimmlech ermiddend.

Zesummefaassend: Mir kënnen déi Kategorie och dobäi halen, dat geet séier, well ech souwisou nach eng Kéier iwwer all d'Artikele kucke bis Enn des Joers. Eng Klarifikatioun ass néideg op dat sech soll op all Iwwerkategorië soll bezéien, oder just op "Kategorie:XXXlännesch Filmer".

--Bdx (Diskussioun) 17:19, 15. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Ech hunn net aggressiv reagéiert. Nodeems ech am Artikel Ashcan d'Kategorie Lëtzebuergesch Filmer erëm bäigesat hat hues du si geläscht. Duerfir wollt ech d'Fro vun de Kategorien nach eng Kéier opwerfen an hunn se dunn einfach op de Staminee gesat eng ganz normal Saach an der Wiki, dat een dat als aggressiv fënnt verstinn ech net.
Wat elo in a Dark Place betrëfft muss e just lëtzebuergesch Filmer a Brittesch Filmer . Fir de Rescht ass et ganz einfach bei all Film gehéiert fir d'éischt d'Kategorie vum Land oder vun de Länner wou hie produzéiert gouf fir eng komplett Lescht vun alle Filmer (egal vu wat fir engem Genre) déi an deem Land produzéiert goufen ze hunn
09:58, 16. Dez. 2021 (UTC)~ Johnny Chicago (Diskussioun) 09:58, 16. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]
Passiv-agressiv: "firwat däerf dat an der lëtzebuergescher Wiki net méi esou sinn". Mee bon.
Menger Meenung no ass dat dann awer net koherent. Wa mir gären hätten, datt all d'Filmer an der Iwwerkategorie vum Land gewise ginn, da missten se jo och an der Iwwerkategorie vum Genre gewise ginn; firwat soll et fir de Genre anescht sinn? Ech si mir net 100% sécher, datt ech dech richteg verstanen hunn, kéints du dat w.e.g nach eng Kéier an anere Wierder schreiwen? --Bdx (Diskussioun) 11:18, 16. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]
Gudden Owend Bdx
lies einfach emol wat de Les Meloures de 14. geschriwwen huet dann ass alles kloer.
Wat soll ech soss nach soen?
dann nach eng Kéier kuck emol op der däitscher Wiki de Film
Der Frosch mit der Maske.
Kategorien:
Filmtitel 1959
Deutscher Film
Dänischer Film
Schwarzweißfilm
Kriminalfilm
Edgar-Wallace-Verfilmung
Einfach wéi Bonjour.
nach e schéinen Owend
`````` Johnny Chicago (Diskussioun) 18:40, 16. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]
Nach e Beispill:
De Film: Voices from Chernobyl (Film)
Categories:
2016 films
French-language films
2016 documentary films
Luxembourgian films
Luxembourgian documentary films
Films directed by Pol Cruchten
Documentary films about the Chernobyl disaster
European film stubs
Luxembourg stubs
Environmental documentary film stubs Johnny Chicago (Diskussioun) 18:53, 16. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Gudde Moien, leider ass et net "einfach wéi Bonjour", an net d'Äntwer op meng Fro. Wann ech nach eng Kéi nogefrot hunn, dann ass dat net fir ze nerven, mee fir sécher ze sinn, datt ech eppes richteg verstinn. Dat ass dann och an dengem Interessi. Ech hu mir ugekuckt, wéi Filmer an den anere Sproocheversioune vu Wikipedia kategoriséiert ginn, et ass anescht op der däitscher an der englescher Versioun (esouguer an denge Beispiller): déi englesch huet och d'Iwwerkategorie fir de Genre. Ech ginn dann elo nom englesche System. Ech gi bis Enn des Joers souwisou nach eng Kéier iwwer all d'Filmer a maachen dat dann. --Bdx (Diskussioun) 09:54, 17. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

D'Iwwerkategorie an de Genre wéi zb. Kriminalfilmer gi gebraucht wa nach keng Kategorie no Länner fir dat Land do ass (sou z. B. bei de Thrilleren) . Ass eng Lännerkategorie do ginn d'Filmer an d'Lännerkategorie eriwwergeholl. Ech ginn zou dat net alles perfekt an de Kategorien ass. Et muss nach a ville Filmer d'Lännerkategorie bäigesat ginn déi geläscht gouf oder vergiess gouf.
10:42, 17. Dez. 2021 (UTC)~ Johnny Chicago (Diskussioun) 10:42, 17. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]
Beim genee Nokucken vun der Kategorie Thrilleren ass mer elo opgefall dat d'Romaner an d'Filmer duercherneen an enger Kategorie stinn do muss eng nei Kategorie fir d'Filmthriller bäigesat ginn.
10:54, 17. Dez. 2021 (UTC)~ Johnny Chicago (Diskussioun) 10:54, 17. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Thrilleren

änneren
Ech raumen déi, et gëtt iwwregens eng Kategorie fir d'Filmthrilleren. Déi zwou sinn net gutt ugeluecht a mussen ëmgenannt ginn.
PS: De Roboter huet mol all déi lëtzebuergesch Filmer nees an d'Iwwerkategorie ageraumt. E kuckt lo och déi aner nach no. --Les Meloures (Diskussioun) 13:03, 17. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]
Merci
16:05, 17. Dez. 2021 (UTC)~ Johnny Chicago (Diskussioun) 16:05, 17. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Bevorstehende Konsultation anlässlich der Wahlen zum Board of Trustees

änneren
Diese Nachricht liegt auf Meta-Wiki auch in weitere Sprachen übersetzt vor.
Méi Sproochen • Hëlleft wgl. fir an Är Sprooch z'iwwersetzen

Das Board of Trustees bereitet eine Konsultation der Community vom 7. Januar bis 10. Februar 2022 zu den bevorstehenden Boardwahlen vor.

Obwohl die Details erst in der Woche vor der Konsultation festgelegt werden, stehen schon jetzt mindestens zwei Fragen fest, die während der Konsultation gestellt werden sollen:

  • Wie kann eine faire Vertretung aufstrebender Communities im Board am besten gewährleistet werden?
  • Wie sollten sich die Kandidierenden während der Wahl einbringen dürfen?

Es können noch weitere Fragen hinzukommen, aber das Movement Strategy and Governance Team möchte den Mitgliedern der Communitys und den Affiliates Zeit geben, sich bereits mit den bestätigten Fragen auseinanderzusetzen und Ideen vorzubereiten, bevor die Konsultation beginnt. Wir entschuldigen uns dafür, dass wir zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt noch keine vollständige Liste der Fragen haben. Die Liste der Fragen sollte nur um ein oder zwei Fragen erweitert werden. Wir wollen die Communitys nicht mit Anfragen überhäufen, aber wir möchten sie darauf hinweisen und freuen uns über Feedback zu diesen wichtigen Fragen.

Möchtest du bei der Organisation von lokalen Gesprächsrunden während dieser Konsultation helfen?

Kontaktiere das Movement Strategy and Governance Team auf Meta, auf Telegram, oder per E-Mail an msg wikimedia.org.

Bitte meldet euch, wenn ihr Fragen oder Bedenken habt. Das Team "Movement Strategy and Governance" wird bis zum 3. Januar nur in geringem Umfang besetzt sein. Bitte entschuldige eventuelle Verzögerungen während dieser Zeit. Wir wissen auch, dass einige Communitys und Affiliates über die Feiertage im Dezember offline sind. Wir entschuldigen uns, wenn unsere Nachricht dich während der Feiertage erreicht hat.

Beste Grüße,

das Movement Strategy & Governance Team

Villmools Merci. DBarthel (WMF) 19:42, 27. Dez. 2021 (UTC)[äntweren]

Vun „https://lb.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:De_Staminee/Archiv_2021&oldid=2393707“