Townie

Merci, datt Dir op der Wikipedia experimentéiert hutt. Ären Test huet geklappt an e gouf verbessert, zeréckgesat oder geläscht. Wgl. benotzt d'Sandkaul fir all weider Tester an Experimenter. Kuckt Iech och eis Begréissungssäit un, wann Dir méi wëllt gewuer ginn, wéi een hei matschaffe kann.

@87.65.83.203 Sorry for not speaking Luxembourgish. I don't understand why you reverted my edit over at Henri Grethen; I think that statement was referenced and thus should remain on the article. --Townie (Diskussioun) 09:35, 10. Mäe. 2021 (UTC)

Hello Townie

So you ask me why I rereveted your edit. I can ask you the same. You are not involved in this wiki, you don't know wat are the lb:wiki-criterions for Political journalism and biographies, you don't understand the language and however you think that only because there was a reference for an assertion it must be kept. In my opinion that's making it too easy. Best regards --87.65.83.203 09:59, 10. Mäe. 2021 (UTC)

@87.65.83.203: I reverted the edit after I found it using the SWViewer tool. I would appreciate it if you could show me these criteria. Also, I think the statement was fine by these standards: it didn't say that it was 100% true, but rather that it had been reported by the press, and was referenced accordingly. Pinging @Chihirolux. --Townie (Diskussioun) 10:20, 10. Mäe. 2021 (UTC)

As I see you base only on the reference, but not on what was written and how it was. Is it that what I must understand?

The criteria are not listed but derive from memory of how such assertions have been handled in the past in the agreement of the wikipede community on lb: wiki. The assertion of Chihirolux even if referred is one-sided and as such it cannot be disseminated. Coming from a newspaper politically opposed to the political party of the person concerned and published in this extremely short way and without further explanation by one of these one-day wikipedians (please see his contributions), it can be uploaded in the only aim to politically harm that person. While such broadcasts are common in journalism, an encyclopedia should refrain from it. Besides, the information was in a terrible othograph, and we know very well that all the information brought by these wikipedians of sensations who think they provide extremely important information, rarely have an encyclopedic purpose. --87.65.83.203 11:21, 10. Mäe. 2021 (UTC)

I see. I've found some other references (1, 2, 3); if those aren't biased as well, maybe it can be included. --Townie (Diskussioun) 08:09, 11. Mäe. 2021 (UTC)

IMHO, these informations, about Henri Grethen as well as about Jean-Louis Schiltz and every other high-placed personnality, should be mentionned in the article about the Covid-19-pandemic in Luxembourg. --185.106.24.16 09:17, 11. Mäe. 2021 (UTC)